Zane Frazier vs. Cal Worsham
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Zane Frazier
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 9 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -1.2 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Cal Worsham
Full career not yet synced for Cal Worsham — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Zane Frazier
Distance 100.0% (norm 50.2%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 14.9%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 28.7%)
Cal Worsham
Distance 37.3% (norm 50.2%) · Clinch 43.1% (norm 14.9%) · Ground 19.6% (norm 28.7%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Zane Frazier
Head 50.0% (norm 81.2%) · Body 50.0% (norm 8.0%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 5.2%)
Cal Worsham
Head 82.4% (norm 81.2%) · Body 11.8% (norm 8.0%) · Legs 5.9% (norm 5.2%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Frazier L/A | Acc | Open Weight med | Worsham L/A | Acc | Open Weight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 27.8% | 7 / 19 | too few to rate | 27.8% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 63.8% | 6 / 22 | too few to rate | 63.8% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 65.8% | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 65.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 39.3% | 19 / 42 | 45.2% | 39.3% |
| To the body | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 90.5% | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 90.5% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 53.5% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 53.5% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Open Weight: 11 fighters · Open Weight: 11 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Frazier L/A | Opp acc | Open Weight med | vs Worsham L/A | Opp acc | Open Weight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 37.0% | 5 / 19 | too few to rate | 37.0% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 66.7% | 5 / 10 | too few to rate | 66.7% |
| On the ground | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 67.1% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 67.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 47.0% | 11 / 29 | 37.9% | 47.0% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 87.9% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 87.9% |
| To the legs | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 61.2% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 61.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Worsham has more cage time on record.