Warlley Alves vs. Jeremiah Wells
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Warlley Alves
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 8 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
Jeremiah Wells
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.09 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Warlley Alves
Distance 85.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 9.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 5.1% (norm 8.1%)
Jeremiah Wells
Distance 65.4% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 2.3% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 32.3% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Warlley Alves
Head 70.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.6% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 13.6% (norm 8.4%)
Jeremiah Wells
Head 89.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 8.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 2.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Alves L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Wells L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 379 / 861 | 44.0% | 38.6% | 85 / 229 | 37.1% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 71 / 97 | 73.2% | 67.8% | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 35 / 51 | 68.6% | 67.2% | 71 / 113 | 62.8% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 268 / 715 | 37.5% | 37.2% | 133 / 313 | 42.5% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 111 / 157 | 70.7% | 70.7% | 24 / 29 | 82.8% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 106 / 137 | 77.4% | 82.9% | 4 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Alves L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Wells L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 466 / 1046 | 44.6% | 39.0% | 69 / 144 | 47.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 128 / 168 | 76.2% | 68.9% | 10 / 11 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 35 / 62 | 56.5% | 68.0% | 9 / 15 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 423 / 995 | 42.5% | 35.6% | 48 / 125 | 38.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 150 / 210 | 71.4% | 69.6% | 29 / 33 | 87.9% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 56 / 71 | 78.9% | 82.1% | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Alves has more cage time on record.