Wallid Ismail vs. Yoshiki Takahashi
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Wallid Ismail
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.68 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 12 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Yoshiki Takahashi
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 29 | 27 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.3 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 20 finish wins over 61 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Wallid Ismail
Distance 100.0% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.0%)
Yoshiki Takahashi
Distance 62.8% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 14.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 23.3% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Wallid Ismail
Head 100.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 0.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 7.9%)
Yoshiki Takahashi
Head 100.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 0.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ismail L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Takahashi L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1 / 17 | too few to rate | 37.9% | 9 / 27 | 33.3% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.3% | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 1 / 17 | too few to rate | 35.0% | 20 / 43 | 46.5% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 81.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ismail L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Takahashi L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 9 / 27 | 33.3% | 38.9% | 1 / 17 | too few to rate | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 68.6% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 20 / 43 | 46.5% | 35.1% | 1 / 17 | too few to rate | 35.1% |
| To the body | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.1% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ismail has more cage time on record.