Tiki Ghosn vs. Sean Sherk
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Tiki Ghosn
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.07 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Sean Sherk
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 27 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.32 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 21 finish wins over 41 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Tiki Ghosn
Distance 71.4% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 28.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
Sean Sherk
Distance 73.0% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 11.3% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 15.7% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Tiki Ghosn
Head 58.6% (norm 78.2%) · Body 23.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 18.0% (norm 8.4%)
Sean Sherk
Head 90.6% (norm 78.2%) · Body 3.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.5% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ghosn L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Sherk L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 95 | 40.0% | 38.6% | 220 / 873 | 25.2% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 21 / 38 | 55.3% | 67.8% | 65 / 135 | 48.1% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 130 / 188 | 69.1% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 21 / 78 | 26.9% | 37.2% | 311 / 1084 | 28.7% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 21 / 31 | 67.7% | 70.7% | 43 / 46 | 93.5% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 17 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 61 / 66 | 92.4% | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ghosn L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Sherk L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 41 / 111 | 36.9% | 39.0% | 425 / 1030 | 41.3% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 21 / 28 | 75.0% | 68.9% | 52 / 79 | 65.8% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 11 / 15 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 68 / 104 | 65.4% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 50 / 118 | 42.4% | 35.6% | 426 / 1062 | 40.1% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 14 / 23 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 93 / 115 | 80.9% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 26 / 36 | 72.2% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Sherk has more cage time on record.