Stephanie Egger vs. Luana Santos
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Stephanie Egger
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.65 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Luana Santos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.66 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 7.5%)
Luana Santos
Distance 89.3% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 9.3% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.2%) · Body 9.7% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.8%)
Luana Santos
Head 71.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 20.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 7.4% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Santos L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.3% | 174 / 325 | 53.5% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 73.3% | 17 / 34 | 50.0% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.7% | 115 / 261 | 44.1% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 70.0% | 57 / 76 | 75.0% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.9% | 23 / 27 | 85.2% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Santos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% | 149 / 478 | 31.2% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 38.1% | 123 / 426 | 28.9% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% | 43 / 67 | 64.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.9% | 23 / 38 | 60.5% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Egger has more cage time on record.