Ricardo Funch vs. Claude Patrick
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Ricardo Funch
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.23 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Claude Patrick
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.35 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Ricardo Funch
Distance 54.8% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 32.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 12.3% (norm 8.1%)
Claude Patrick
Distance 37.1% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 36.5% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 26.3% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Ricardo Funch
Head 50.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 33.6% (norm 8.4%)
Claude Patrick
Head 71.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 18.6% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 10.2% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Funch L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Patrick L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 35 / 80 | 43.8% | 38.6% | 19 / 62 | 30.6% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 42 / 48 | 87.5% | 67.8% | 46 / 61 | 75.4% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 18 / 18 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 28 / 44 | 63.6% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 34 / 74 | 45.9% | 37.2% | 54 / 119 | 45.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 14 / 23 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 26 / 31 | 83.9% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 47 / 49 | 95.9% | 82.9% | 13 / 17 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Funch L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Patrick L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 47 / 108 | 43.5% | 39.0% | 19 / 110 | 17.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 52 / 68 | 76.5% | 68.9% | 22 / 36 | 61.1% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 31 / 41 | 75.6% | 68.0% | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 93 / 174 | 53.4% | 35.6% | 18 / 103 | 17.5% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 25 / 30 | 83.3% | 69.6% | 10 / 20 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 12 / 13 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 18 / 28 | 64.3% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Funch has more cage time on record.