Renan Barao vs. Mitch Gagnon
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Renan Barao
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 8 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 25 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.05 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 23 finish wins over 45 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Mitch Gagnon
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Renan Barao
Distance 90.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.4% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 6.5%)
Mitch Gagnon
Distance 70.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 12.7% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Renan Barao
Head 75.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 15.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.5% (norm 8.4%)
Mitch Gagnon
Head 77.3% (norm 77.4%) · Body 16.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Barao L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Gagnon L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 772 / 2279 | 33.9% | 39.0% | 126 / 327 | 38.5% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 107 / 160 | 66.9% | 68.7% | 50 / 77 | 64.9% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 43 / 69 | 62.3% | 70.2% | 39 / 59 | 66.1% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 538 / 1893 | 28.4% | 34.9% | 138 / 358 | 38.5% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 211 / 376 | 56.1% | 66.8% | 52 / 74 | 70.3% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 173 / 239 | 72.4% | 79.4% | 25 / 31 | 80.6% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Barao L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Gagnon L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 816 / 2086 | 39.1% | 39.3% | 105 / 348 | 30.2% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 84 / 119 | 70.6% | 70.4% | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 57 / 74 | 77.0% | 72.4% | 16 / 33 | 48.5% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 654 / 1854 | 35.3% | 34.9% | 86 / 327 | 26.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 178 / 270 | 65.9% | 66.0% | 48 / 74 | 64.9% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 125 / 155 | 80.6% | 79.1% | 38 / 51 | 74.5% | 79.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Barao has more cage time on record.