Per Eklund vs. Evan Dunham
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Per Eklund
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.63 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500
Evan Dunham
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.92 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-9 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Per Eklund
Distance 52.0% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 34.7% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 13.3% (norm 8.0%)
Evan Dunham
Distance 89.9% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 3.2% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Per Eklund
Head 58.2% (norm 78.2%) · Body 32.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.2% (norm 7.9%)
Evan Dunham
Head 91.1% (norm 78.2%) · Body 7.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.9% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Eklund L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Dunham L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 25 / 51 | 49.0% | 37.9% | 1024 / 2811 | 36.4% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 34 | 73.5% | 67.3% | 142 / 218 | 65.1% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 10 / 13 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 62 / 99 | 62.6% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 24 / 57 | 42.1% | 35.0% | 1039 / 2849 | 36.5% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 28 / 32 | 87.5% | 69.1% | 137 / 221 | 62.0% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 8 / 9 | too few to rate | 81.9% | 52 / 58 | 89.7% | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Eklund L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Dunham L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 24 / 138 | 17.4% | 38.9% | 639 / 1840 | 34.7% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 20 | too few to rate | 68.6% | 122 / 202 | 60.4% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 30 / 52 | 57.7% | 68.0% | 55 / 87 | 63.2% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 39 / 172 | 22.7% | 35.1% | 557 / 1767 | 31.5% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 8 / 12 | too few to rate | 68.1% | 160 / 232 | 69.0% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 22 / 26 | 84.6% | 81.5% | 99 / 130 | 76.2% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dunham has more cage time on record.