Oli Thompson vs. Philip De Fries
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Oli Thompson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 22 | 14 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.03 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 18 finish wins over 40 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Philip De Fries
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 26 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.98 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 24 finish wins over 36 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Oli Thompson
Distance 85.6% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 14.4% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 9.3%)
Philip De Fries
Distance 61.7% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 19.5% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 18.8% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Oli Thompson
Head 67.0% (norm 79.2%) · Body 19.6% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 13.4% (norm 7.6%)
Philip De Fries
Head 93.2% (norm 79.2%) · Body 6.0% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 0.8% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Thompson L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Fries L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 36 / 83 | 43.4% | 40.1% | 27 / 82 | 32.9% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 11 / 14 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 21 / 26 | 80.8% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 15 / 25 | 60.0% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 19 / 65 | 29.2% | 38.9% | 56 / 124 | 45.2% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 17 / 19 | too few to rate | 76.8% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 76.8% |
| To the legs | 11 / 13 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Thompson L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Fries L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 71 / 150 | 47.3% | 40.7% | 31 / 75 | 41.3% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 23 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 21 / 26 | 80.8% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 9 / 17 | too few to rate | 72.0% | 30 / 31 | 96.8% | 72.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 86 / 175 | 49.1% | 38.8% | 48 / 93 | 51.6% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 12 / 14 | too few to rate | 75.1% | 27 / 30 | 90.0% | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 84.4% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Fries has more cage time on record.