Norma Dumont vs. Irene Aldana
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Norma Dumont
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.38 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 2 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.2 wins over .500
Irene Aldana
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.92 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Norma Dumont
Distance 87.8% (norm 72.1%) · Clinch 8.2% (norm 16.0%) · Ground 4.1% (norm 11.9%)
Irene Aldana
Distance 93.9% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 2.8% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 3.3% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Norma Dumont
Head 74.7% (norm 74.7%) · Body 14.2% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 11.1% (norm 9.0%)
Irene Aldana
Head 81.5% (norm 75.2%) · Body 9.6% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 8.9% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dumont L/A | Acc | Women's Featherweight med | Aldana L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 559 / 1183 | 47.3% | 47.3% | 948 / 2504 | 37.9% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 90 / 110 | 81.8% | 78.3% | 55 / 74 | 74.3% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 38 / 55 | 69.1% | 69.1% | 62 / 89 | 69.7% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 413 / 1007 | 41.0% | 42.9% | 743 / 2174 | 34.2% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 151 / 191 | 79.1% | 79.1% | 145 / 255 | 56.9% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 123 / 150 | 82.0% | 82.0% | 177 / 238 | 74.4% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Featherweight: 3 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dumont L/A | Opp acc | Women's Featherweight med | vs Aldana L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 343 / 1060 | 32.4% | 32.4% | 1258 / 2942 | 42.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 64 / 88 | 72.7% | 72.7% | 44 / 74 | 59.5% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 9 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.2% | 61 / 103 | 59.2% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 216 / 821 | 26.3% | 26.3% | 828 / 2395 | 34.6% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 119 / 203 | 58.6% | 60.3% | 242 / 388 | 62.4% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 81 / 142 | 57.0% | 67.6% | 293 / 336 | 87.2% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Aldana has more cage time on record.