Miesha Tate vs. Julia Avila
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Miesha Tate
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.71 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Julia Avila
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.85 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Miesha Tate
Distance 78.1% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 11.2% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 10.7% (norm 7.5%)
Julia Avila
Distance 87.6% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 10.0% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 2.3% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Miesha Tate
Head 74.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 19.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 5.4% (norm 8.8%)
Julia Avila
Head 76.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.7% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 11.5% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Tate L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Avila L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 400 / 1049 | 38.1% | 38.3% | 157 / 411 | 38.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 103 / 150 | 68.7% | 73.3% | 33 / 47 | 70.2% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 115 / 144 | 79.9% | 70.8% | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 398 / 1004 | 39.6% | 37.7% | 117 / 360 | 32.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 169 / 267 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 36 / 55 | 65.5% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 51 / 72 | 70.8% | 80.9% | 46 / 54 | 85.2% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Tate L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Avila L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 448 / 1085 | 41.3% | 41.3% | 166 / 431 | 38.5% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 139 / 180 | 77.2% | 74.7% | 11 / 21 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 63 / 90 | 70.0% | 74.2% | 56 / 72 | 77.8% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 450 / 1109 | 40.6% | 38.1% | 186 / 459 | 40.5% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 120 / 154 | 77.9% | 73.2% | 27 / 38 | 71.1% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 80 / 92 | 87.0% | 80.9% | 20 / 27 | 74.1% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Tate has more cage time on record.