Michelle Montague vs. Luana Carolina
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Michelle Montague
Full career not yet synced for Michelle Montague — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Luana Carolina
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.16 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.9 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Michelle Montague
Distance 55.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 1.2% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 43.9% (norm 7.5%)
Luana Carolina
Distance 78.9% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 15.4% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 5.7% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Michelle Montague
Head 91.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 7.0% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 1.2% (norm 8.8%)
Luana Carolina
Head 69.1% (norm 78.1%) · Body 20.7% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 10.2% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Montague L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Carolina L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 33 / 94 | 35.1% | 38.3% | 430 / 940 | 45.7% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 132 / 183 | 72.1% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 49 / 75 | 65.3% | 70.8% | 42 / 68 | 61.8% | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 75 / 157 | 47.8% | 37.7% | 321 / 823 | 39.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.0% | 183 / 247 | 74.1% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 100 / 121 | 82.6% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Montague L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Carolina L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 68 / 115 | 59.1% | 41.3% | 316 / 762 | 41.5% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 4 / 9 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 107 / 145 | 73.8% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 44 / 67 | 65.7% | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 42 / 87 | 48.3% | 38.1% | 262 / 688 | 38.1% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 15 / 18 | too few to rate | 73.2% | 148 / 204 | 72.5% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 57 / 82 | 69.5% | 78.7% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Carolina has more cage time on record.