Matt Wiman vs. Luis Pena
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Matt Wiman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 10 | 8 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.87 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.9 wins over .500
Luis Pena
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.59 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Matt Wiman
Distance 55.0% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 18.6% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 26.3% (norm 8.0%)
Luis Pena
Distance 74.8% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 7.9% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 17.3% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Matt Wiman
Head 80.1% (norm 78.2%) · Body 8.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 11.4% (norm 7.9%)
Luis Pena
Head 88.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 9.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 2.2% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Wiman L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Pena L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 247 / 612 | 40.4% | 37.9% | 246 / 600 | 41.0% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 139 / 207 | 67.1% | 67.3% | 35 / 63 | 55.6% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 171 / 293 | 58.4% | 69.1% | 95 / 139 | 68.3% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 386 / 891 | 43.3% | 35.0% | 313 / 710 | 44.1% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 69 / 94 | 73.4% | 69.1% | 47 / 74 | 63.5% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 102 / 127 | 80.3% | 81.9% | 16 / 18 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Wiman L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Pena L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 263 / 717 | 36.7% | 38.9% | 279 / 592 | 47.1% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 193 / 292 | 66.1% | 68.6% | 23 / 35 | 65.7% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 171 / 273 | 62.6% | 68.0% | 18 / 28 | 64.3% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 457 / 1067 | 42.8% | 35.1% | 147 / 439 | 33.5% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 123 / 152 | 80.9% | 68.1% | 73 / 113 | 64.6% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 47 / 63 | 74.6% | 81.5% | 100 / 103 | 97.1% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Wiman has more cage time on record.