Mark Coleman vs. Brian Johnston
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Mark Coleman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.16 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Brian Johnston
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.16 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 10 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Mark Coleman
Distance 31.5% (norm 50.2%) · Clinch 11.2% (norm 14.9%) · Ground 57.3% (norm 28.7%)
Brian Johnston
Distance 39.6% (norm 50.2%) · Clinch 39.6% (norm 14.9%) · Ground 20.8% (norm 28.7%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Mark Coleman
Head 94.1% (norm 81.2%) · Body 4.3% (norm 8.0%) · Legs 1.6% (norm 5.2%)
Brian Johnston
Head 73.6% (norm 81.2%) · Body 13.2% (norm 8.0%) · Legs 13.2% (norm 5.2%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Coleman L/A | Acc | Open Weight med | Johnston L/A | Acc | Open Weight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 47 / 138 | 34.1% | 27.8% | 8 / 21 | too few to rate | 27.8% |
| In the clinch | 37 / 49 | 75.5% | 63.8% | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 63.8% |
| On the ground | 159 / 251 | 63.3% | 65.8% | 7 / 11 | too few to rate | 65.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 220 / 412 | 53.4% | 39.3% | 18 / 39 | 46.2% | 39.3% |
| To the body | 17 / 19 | too few to rate | 90.5% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 90.5% |
| To the legs | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 53.5% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 53.5% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Open Weight: 11 fighters · Open Weight: 11 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Coleman L/A | Opp acc | Open Weight med | vs Johnston L/A | Opp acc | Open Weight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 132 / 252 | 52.4% | 37.0% | 4 / 14 | too few to rate | 37.0% |
| In the clinch | 47 / 66 | 71.2% | 66.7% | 8 / 13 | too few to rate | 66.7% |
| On the ground | 55 / 70 | 78.6% | 67.1% | 42 / 63 | 66.7% | 67.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 158 / 302 | 52.3% | 47.0% | 45 / 81 | 55.6% | 47.0% |
| To the body | 28 / 34 | 82.4% | 87.9% | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 87.9% |
| To the legs | 48 / 52 | 92.3% | 61.2% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 61.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Coleman has more cage time on record.