Luiz Cane vs. Chris Camozzi
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Luiz Cane
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.79 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 25 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Chris Camozzi
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 11 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 16 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.69 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 42 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Luiz Cane
Distance 84.1% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 5.0% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 11.0% (norm 10.4%)
Chris Camozzi
Distance 88.5% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 10.1% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 1.5% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Luiz Cane
Head 89.4% (norm 79.2%) · Body 6.9% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 3.7% (norm 9.7%)
Chris Camozzi
Head 76.5% (norm 78.0%) · Body 9.9% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 13.6% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cane L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Camozzi L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 203 / 522 | 38.9% | 41.4% | 655 / 1575 | 41.6% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 31 | 48.4% | 70.9% | 126 / 179 | 70.4% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 40 / 68 | 58.8% | 72.3% | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 203 / 555 | 36.6% | 38.9% | 470 / 1362 | 34.5% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 32 / 43 | 74.4% | 71.9% | 130 / 176 | 73.9% | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 23 / 23 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 200 / 242 | 82.6% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cane L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Camozzi L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 245 / 655 | 37.4% | 40.4% | 442 / 1206 | 36.7% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 22 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 133 / 191 | 69.6% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 89 / 124 | 71.8% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 181 / 574 | 31.5% | 37.5% | 366 / 1106 | 33.1% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 40 / 52 | 76.9% | 72.3% | 136 / 225 | 60.4% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 48 / 63 | 76.2% | 83.0% | 162 / 190 | 85.3% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Camozzi has more cage time on record.