Luana Santos vs. Melissa Croden
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Luana Santos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.66 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Melissa Croden
Full career not yet synced for Melissa Croden — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Luana Santos
Distance 89.3% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 9.3% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 7.5%)
Melissa Croden
Distance 72.6% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 12.4% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 14.9% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Luana Santos
Head 71.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 20.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 7.4% (norm 8.8%)
Melissa Croden
Head 78.4% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Santos L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Croden L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 174 / 325 | 53.5% | 38.3% | 118 / 292 | 40.4% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 34 | 50.0% | 73.3% | 34 / 50 | 68.0% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 38 / 60 | 63.3% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 115 / 261 | 44.1% | 37.7% | 134 / 315 | 42.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 57 / 76 | 75.0% | 70.0% | 31 / 48 | 64.6% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 23 / 27 | 85.2% | 80.9% | 25 / 39 | 64.1% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Santos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Croden L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 149 / 478 | 31.2% | 41.3% | 68 / 196 | 34.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 74.7% | 27 / 37 | 73.0% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 123 / 426 | 28.9% | 38.1% | 59 / 186 | 31.7% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 43 / 67 | 64.2% | 73.2% | 29 / 40 | 72.5% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 23 / 38 | 60.5% | 80.9% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Santos has more cage time on record.