Liang Na vs. Silvana Gomez Juarez
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Liang Na
Full career not yet synced for Liang Na — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
Silvana Gomez Juarez
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.56 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Liang Na
Distance 86.1% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 11.7% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.2% (norm 4.9%)
Silvana Gomez Juarez
Distance 93.8% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 2.3% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 3.9% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Liang Na
Head 74.5% (norm 78.1%) · Body 18.2% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 7.3% (norm 7.7%)
Silvana Gomez Juarez
Head 86.6% (norm 76.4%) · Body 9.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 3.6% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Na L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Juarez L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 46 / 118 | 39.0% | 39.9% | 87 / 287 | 30.3% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 32 / 102 | 31.4% | 34.9% | 66 / 265 | 24.9% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 69.5% | 24 / 30 | 80.0% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 82.6% | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Na L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Juarez L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 29 / 71 | 40.8% | 38.8% | 87 / 237 | 36.7% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 14 | too few to rate | 74.1% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 76 / 97 | 78.4% | 73.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 105 / 169 | 62.1% | 35.3% | 67 / 201 | 33.3% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 17 / 31 | 54.8% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 78.7% | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Na has more cage time on record.