Justin Ledet vs. Aleksa Camur
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Justin Ledet
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.85 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Aleksa Camur
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.97 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 9 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Justin Ledet
Distance 97.5% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 2.3% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 0.2% (norm 10.4%)
Aleksa Camur
Distance 83.9% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 15.9% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 0.2% (norm 10.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Justin Ledet
Head 96.1% (norm 79.2%) · Body 3.2% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 0.7% (norm 9.7%)
Aleksa Camur
Head 68.7% (norm 79.2%) · Body 22.1% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 9.2% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ledet L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Camur L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 208 / 545 | 38.2% | 41.4% | 205 / 402 | 51.0% | 41.4% |
| In the clinch | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 61 / 76 | 80.3% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 72.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 203 / 537 | 37.8% | 38.9% | 150 / 329 | 45.6% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 13 / 18 | too few to rate | 71.9% | 86 / 106 | 81.1% | 71.9% |
| To the legs | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 31 / 44 | 70.5% | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ledet L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Camur L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 206 / 473 | 43.6% | 40.4% | 196 / 499 | 39.3% | 40.4% |
| In the clinch | 21 / 32 | 65.6% | 68.7% | 58 / 73 | 79.5% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 87 / 111 | 78.4% | 70.4% | 19 / 21 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 200 / 441 | 45.4% | 37.5% | 206 / 502 | 41.0% | 37.5% |
| To the body | 47 / 83 | 56.6% | 72.3% | 39 / 59 | 66.1% | 72.3% |
| To the legs | 67 / 92 | 72.8% | 83.0% | 28 / 32 | 87.5% | 83.0% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ledet has more cage time on record.