Jordan Radev vs. Dean Lister
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jordan Radev
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 23 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.8 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Dean Lister
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.7 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jordan Radev
Distance 84.6% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 9.9% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 5.5% (norm 10.3%)
Dean Lister
Distance 83.2% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 8.6% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 8.2% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jordan Radev
Head 82.4% (norm 78.0%) · Body 2.2% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 15.4% (norm 8.4%)
Dean Lister
Head 79.3% (norm 78.0%) · Body 9.4% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 11.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Radev L/A | Acc | Middleweight med | Lister L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 17 / 77 | 22.1% | 40.5% | 66 / 213 | 31.0% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 9 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 4 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 1 / 5 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 16 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 12 / 75 | 16.0% | 38.9% | 53 / 203 | 26.1% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 71.7% | 11 / 24 | too few to rate | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 7 / 14 | too few to rate | 83.3% | 22 / 29 | 75.9% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Middleweight: 174 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Radev L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med | vs Lister L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 28 / 93 | 30.1% | 39.5% | 81 / 265 | 30.6% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 6 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 25 / 39 | 64.1% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 35 / 57 | 61.4% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 23 / 81 | 28.4% | 37.9% | 108 / 315 | 34.3% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 9 / 20 | too few to rate | 71.3% | 15 / 20 | too few to rate | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 18 / 26 | 69.2% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lister has more cage time on record.