Jonathan Goulet vs. Paul Georgieff
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jonathan Goulet
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 19 | 7 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.43 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 20 finish wins over 36 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
Paul Georgieff
Full career not yet synced for Paul Georgieff — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jonathan Goulet
Distance 57.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 16.1% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 26.4% (norm 8.1%)
Paul Georgieff
Distance 80.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 6.7% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 13.3% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jonathan Goulet
Head 83.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 8.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.3% (norm 8.4%)
Paul Georgieff
Head 90.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 3.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 6.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Goulet L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Georgieff L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 111 | 34.2% | 38.6% | 8 / 24 | too few to rate | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 31 | 51.6% | 67.8% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 27 / 51 | 52.9% | 67.2% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 55 / 161 | 34.2% | 37.2% | 9 / 27 | 33.3% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Goulet L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Georgieff L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 42 / 100 | 42.0% | 39.0% | 4 / 9 | too few to rate | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 50 / 75 | 66.7% | 68.0% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 84 / 170 | 49.4% | 35.6% | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 35.6% |
| To the body | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Goulet has more cage time on record.