Jon Tuck vs. Jake Lindsey
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jon Tuck
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.19 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.1 wins over .500
Jake Lindsey
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 15 | 6 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.09 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jon Tuck
Distance 86.9% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 6.3% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 6.8% (norm 8.0%)
Jake Lindsey
Distance 74.7% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 23.3% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 2.0% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jon Tuck
Head 77.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 13.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 8.8% (norm 7.9%)
Jake Lindsey
Head 49.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 28.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 22.7% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Tuck L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Lindsey L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 259 / 703 | 36.8% | 37.9% | 50 / 112 | 44.6% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 51 | 58.8% | 67.3% | 28 / 35 | 80.0% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 35 / 55 | 63.6% | 69.1% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 182 / 630 | 28.9% | 35.0% | 21 / 74 | 28.4% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 82 / 108 | 75.9% | 69.1% | 32 / 42 | 76.2% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 60 / 71 | 84.5% | 81.9% | 26 / 34 | 76.5% | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Tuck L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Lindsey L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 302 / 885 | 34.1% | 38.9% | 58 / 126 | 46.0% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 50 / 71 | 70.4% | 68.6% | 14 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 52 / 72 | 72.2% | 68.0% | 20 / 29 | 69.0% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 270 / 826 | 32.7% | 35.1% | 61 / 136 | 44.9% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 89 / 136 | 65.4% | 68.1% | 25 / 28 | 89.3% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 45 / 66 | 68.2% | 81.5% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Tuck has more cage time on record.