John Howard vs. Tamdan McCrory
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
John Howard
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 18 | 9 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.5 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 17 finish wins over 47 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Tamdan McCrory
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.19 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 19 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
John Howard
Distance 68.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 23.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 9.1% (norm 8.1%)
Tamdan McCrory
Distance 50.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 18.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 32.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
John Howard
Head 66.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 13.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 20.4% (norm 8.4%)
Tamdan McCrory
Head 80.2% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 7.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Howard L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | McCrory L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 222 / 494 | 44.9% | 38.6% | 59 / 164 | 36.0% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 99 / 167 | 59.3% | 67.8% | 33 / 59 | 55.9% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 48 / 66 | 72.7% | 67.2% | 68 / 105 | 64.8% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 175 / 483 | 36.2% | 37.2% | 109 / 263 | 41.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 68 / 96 | 70.8% | 70.7% | 31 / 41 | 75.6% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 126 / 148 | 85.1% | 82.9% | 20 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Howard L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs McCrory L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 311 / 772 | 40.3% | 39.0% | 68 / 142 | 47.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 128 / 175 | 73.1% | 68.9% | 9 / 15 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 90 / 137 | 65.7% | 68.0% | 47 / 74 | 63.5% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 262 / 742 | 35.3% | 35.6% | 53 / 134 | 39.6% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 152 / 198 | 76.8% | 69.6% | 36 / 49 | 73.5% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 115 / 144 | 79.9% | 82.1% | 35 / 48 | 72.9% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Howard has more cage time on record.