Jarjis Danho vs. Daniel Omielanczuk
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jarjis Danho
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.15 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 9 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Daniel Omielanczuk
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 20 | 8 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.46 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 39 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jarjis Danho
Distance 70.2% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 26.3% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 3.5% (norm 9.3%)
Daniel Omielanczuk
Distance 71.2% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 22.8% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 6.0% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jarjis Danho
Head 80.3% (norm 79.2%) · Body 14.6% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 5.1% (norm 7.6%)
Daniel Omielanczuk
Head 66.8% (norm 79.2%) · Body 19.9% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 13.3% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Danho L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Omielanczuk L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 60 / 139 | 43.2% | 40.1% | 196 / 412 | 47.6% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 52 | 63.5% | 70.6% | 107 / 132 | 81.1% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 7 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 29 / 35 | 82.9% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 71 / 159 | 44.7% | 38.9% | 169 / 387 | 43.7% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 21 / 29 | 72.4% | 76.8% | 93 / 115 | 80.9% | 76.8% |
| To the legs | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 70 / 77 | 90.9% | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Danho L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Omielanczuk L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 91 / 212 | 42.9% | 40.7% | 126 / 395 | 31.9% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 59 / 85 | 69.4% | 70.6% | 128 / 160 | 80.0% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 72.0% | 99 / 118 | 83.9% | 72.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 81 / 216 | 37.5% | 38.8% | 167 / 451 | 37.0% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 41 / 55 | 74.5% | 75.1% | 141 / 166 | 84.9% | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 33 / 34 | 97.1% | 84.4% | 45 / 56 | 80.4% | 84.4% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Omielanczuk has more cage time on record.