James Te Huna vs. Nate Marquardt
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
James Te Huna
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.56 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 25 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Nate Marquardt
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 12 | 12 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 24 | 8 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.7 · 12 tier-1/2 wins · 28 finish wins over 58 documented bouts
In the UFC: 10-10 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
James Te Huna
Distance 65.6% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 11.9% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 22.5% (norm 10.4%)
Nate Marquardt
Distance 71.5% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 12.4% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 16.1% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
James Te Huna
Head 78.3% (norm 79.2%) · Body 12.5% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 9.7%)
Nate Marquardt
Head 73.3% (norm 78.0%) · Body 13.3% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 13.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Huna L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Marquardt L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 138 / 309 | 44.7% | 41.4% | 393 / 884 | 44.5% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 34 / 56 | 60.7% | 70.9% | 109 / 153 | 71.2% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 70 / 106 | 66.0% | 72.3% | 133 / 199 | 66.8% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 166 / 369 | 45.0% | 38.9% | 374 / 906 | 41.3% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 39 / 59 | 66.1% | 71.9% | 124 / 165 | 75.2% | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 37 / 43 | 86.0% | 81.8% | 137 / 165 | 83.0% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Huna L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Marquardt L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 98 / 367 | 26.7% | 40.4% | 357 / 972 | 36.7% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 44 | 70.5% | 68.7% | 57 / 106 | 53.8% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 50 / 70 | 71.4% | 70.4% | 82 / 112 | 73.2% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 134 / 424 | 31.6% | 37.5% | 311 / 937 | 33.2% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 19 / 28 | 67.9% | 72.3% | 85 / 125 | 68.0% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 26 / 29 | 89.7% | 83.0% | 100 / 128 | 78.1% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Marquardt has more cage time on record.