James Irvin vs. Houston Alexander
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
James Irvin
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.46 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 29 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Houston Alexander
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 7 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 14 | 8 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.04 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 36 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
James Irvin
Distance 70.2% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 9.1% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 20.7% (norm 10.4%)
Houston Alexander
Distance 54.5% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 22.4% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 23.0% (norm 10.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
James Irvin
Head 66.9% (norm 79.2%) · Body 7.4% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 25.6% (norm 9.7%)
Houston Alexander
Head 64.8% (norm 79.2%) · Body 6.1% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 29.1% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Irvin L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Alexander L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 35 / 85 | 41.2% | 41.4% | 45 / 90 | 50.0% | 41.4% |
| In the clinch | 7 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 24 / 37 | 64.9% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 17 / 25 | 68.0% | 72.3% | 23 / 38 | 60.5% | 72.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 29 / 81 | 35.8% | 38.9% | 49 / 107 | 45.8% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 8 / 9 | too few to rate | 71.9% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 71.9% |
| To the legs | 22 / 31 | 71.0% | 81.8% | 36 / 48 | 75.0% | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Irvin L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Alexander L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 56 / 106 | 52.8% | 40.4% | 21 / 62 | 33.9% | 40.4% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 21 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 12 / 22 | too few to rate | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 38 / 45 | 84.4% | 70.4% | 49 / 72 | 68.1% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 83 / 142 | 58.5% | 37.5% | 68 / 139 | 48.9% | 37.5% |
| To the body | 19 / 21 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 72.3% |
| To the legs | 9 / 9 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Irvin has more cage time on record.