Issei Tamura vs. Zhang Tiequan
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Issei Tamura
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 14 | 10 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.11 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 27 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Zhang Tiequan
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 14 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 19 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Issei Tamura
Distance 65.5% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 15.5% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 19.0% (norm 6.5%)
Zhang Tiequan
Distance 98.6% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 0.7% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 0.7% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Issei Tamura
Head 81.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zhang Tiequan
Head 89.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 2.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 8.5% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Tamura L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Tiequan L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 16 / 38 | 42.1% | 39.0% | 52 / 139 | 37.4% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 24 / 47 | 51.1% | 34.9% | 42 / 126 | 33.3% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 66.8% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 79.4% | 8 / 12 | too few to rate | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Tamura L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Tiequan L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 45 / 100 | 45.0% | 39.3% | 46 / 112 | 41.1% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 19 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 15 / 17 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 33 / 47 | 70.2% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 30 / 80 | 37.5% | 34.9% | 64 / 140 | 45.7% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 66.0% | 13 / 18 | too few to rate | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 31 / 37 | 83.8% | 79.1% | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Tiequan has more cage time on record.