Hyder Amil vs. JeongYeong Lee
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Hyder Amil
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 1 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.61 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
JeongYeong Lee
Full career not yet synced for JeongYeong Lee — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Hyder Amil
Distance 88.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 4.8% (norm 6.5%)
JeongYeong Lee
Distance 81.6% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 7.7% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 10.7% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Hyder Amil
Head 75.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 14.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.8%)
JeongYeong Lee
Head 77.9% (norm 77.4%) · Body 16.7% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 5.4% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Amil L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Lee L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 264 / 518 | 51.0% | 40.9% | 108 / 244 | 44.3% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 70.8% | 21 / 23 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 20 / 28 | 71.4% | 69.2% | 17 / 32 | 53.1% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 196 / 441 | 44.4% | 37.2% | 94 / 233 | 40.3% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 67 / 83 | 80.7% | 68.2% | 38 / 50 | 76.0% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 46 / 63 | 73.0% | 80.7% | 14 / 16 | too few to rate | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Amil L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Lee L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 179 / 379 | 47.2% | 39.2% | 145 / 323 | 44.9% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.3% | 18 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 12 / 14 | too few to rate | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 146 / 345 | 42.3% | 35.9% | 116 / 265 | 43.8% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 67.9% | 28 / 47 | 59.6% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 31 / 47 | 66.0% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Amil has more cage time on record.