Hannah Cifers vs. Mackenzie Dern
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Hannah Cifers
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.27 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500
Mackenzie Dern
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 4 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 1 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.56 · 15 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Hannah Cifers
Distance 82.7% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 14.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 3.1% (norm 5.0%)
Mackenzie Dern
Distance 86.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 5.6% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 8.3% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Hannah Cifers
Head 64.7% (norm 76.4%) · Body 20.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 14.5% (norm 9.1%)
Mackenzie Dern
Head 87.3% (norm 76.4%) · Body 7.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 4.8% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cifers L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Dern L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 215 / 541 | 39.7% | 38.3% | 573 / 1627 | 35.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 65 / 93 | 69.9% | 72.6% | 79 / 105 | 75.2% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 11 / 20 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 134 / 157 | 85.4% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 128 / 423 | 30.3% | 35.4% | 593 / 1649 | 36.0% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 90 / 136 | 66.2% | 69.3% | 110 / 149 | 73.8% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 73 / 95 | 76.8% | 77.9% | 83 / 91 | 91.2% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cifers L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Dern L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 200 / 508 | 39.4% | 39.7% | 724 / 1649 | 43.9% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 71.5% | 129 / 152 | 84.9% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 63 / 88 | 71.6% | 74.4% | 39 / 56 | 69.6% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 204 / 529 | 38.6% | 36.0% | 477 / 1351 | 35.3% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 80 / 107 | 74.8% | 68.4% | 226 / 299 | 75.6% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 30 / 31 | 96.8% | 79.1% | 189 / 207 | 91.3% | 79.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dern has more cage time on record.