Guto Inocente vs. Anthony Perosh
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Guto Inocente
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.26 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Anthony Perosh
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.61 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 25 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Guto Inocente
Distance 72.7% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 27.3% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 10.4%)
Anthony Perosh
Distance 60.9% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 28.3% (norm 10.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Guto Inocente
Head 45.5% (norm 79.2%) · Body 45.5% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 9.7%)
Anthony Perosh
Head 92.3% (norm 79.2%) · Body 1.7% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 6.0% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Inocente L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Perosh L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 4 / 8 | too few to rate | 41.4% | 64 / 213 | 30.0% | 41.4% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 23 / 38 | 60.5% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 64 / 99 | 64.6% | 72.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 1 / 5 | too few to rate | 38.9% | 127 / 323 | 39.3% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 71.9% | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 71.9% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 21 / 21 | too few to rate | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Inocente L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Perosh L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 2 / 13 | too few to rate | 40.4% | 115 / 347 | 33.1% | 40.4% |
| In the clinch | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 46 / 69 | 66.7% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 13 / 17 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 90 / 129 | 69.8% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 15 / 29 | 51.7% | 37.5% | 210 / 495 | 42.4% | 37.5% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 30 / 38 | 78.9% | 72.3% |
| To the legs | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Perosh has more cage time on record.