Gleison Tibau vs. John Cholish
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Gleison Tibau
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 18 | 15 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 22 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.88 · 18 tier-1/2 wins · 20 finish wins over 59 documented bouts
In the UFC: 8-11 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
John Cholish
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.77 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 11 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Gleison Tibau
Distance 81.7% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 8.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 10.3% (norm 8.0%)
John Cholish
Distance 83.7% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 11.6% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Gleison Tibau
Head 89.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 7.6% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 2.5% (norm 7.9%)
John Cholish
Head 80.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 8.4% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 11.6% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Tibau L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Cholish L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 383 / 1543 | 24.8% | 37.9% | 71 / 159 | 44.7% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 99 / 151 | 65.6% | 67.3% | 5 / 9 | too few to rate | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 119 / 195 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 467 / 1698 | 27.5% | 35.0% | 64 / 152 | 42.1% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 91 / 143 | 63.6% | 69.1% | 8 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 43 / 48 | 89.6% | 81.9% | 21 / 22 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Tibau L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Cholish L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 546 / 1755 | 31.1% | 38.9% | 59 / 290 | 20.3% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 156 / 239 | 65.3% | 68.6% | 27 / 37 | 73.0% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 73 / 128 | 57.0% | 68.0% | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 441 / 1615 | 27.3% | 35.1% | 54 / 288 | 18.8% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 209 / 327 | 63.9% | 68.1% | 16 / 22 | too few to rate | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 125 / 180 | 69.4% | 81.5% | 20 / 24 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Tibau has more cage time on record.