Gilbert Burns vs. Jason Saggo

UFC 15-10-0 vs. 3-3-0

Tale of the tape

Green = edge on that line
15-10-0
UFC record
3-3-0
Welterweight
Division (benchmark)
Lightweight
40
AgeΔ 0 yrs
40
5'10"
HeightΔ 1"
5'11"
71"
ReachΔ 0"
71"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
3.7
Layoff (months)Δ 103 mo
106.7
LLLLL
Last 5 (newest first)
LLWWL

The read

Stats 25%+ off the division median
Jason Saggo hunts takedowns — 2.33 per 15 minutes, vs a 1.38 Lightweight norm.
Jason Saggo's takedown defense leaks — 23% stopped, vs a 64% Lightweight norm.
Gilbert Burns hunts takedowns — 2.04 per 15 minutes, vs a 1.27 Welterweight norm.

Level of competition

Full-career record by tier of opposition

Gilbert Burns

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 1510
Tier 3 — regional circuit 70

Tier-weighted record quality: 1.21 · 15 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 32 documented bouts

In the UFC: 9-10 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.2 wins over .500

Jason Saggo

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 33
Tier 3 — regional circuit 101

Tier-weighted record quality: 1.1 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 17 documented bouts

In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500

Striking

Career totals · norms = own-division medians

Significant strikes — landed & absorbed

9743.16/min · norm 3.17
Sig. strikes landed
1612.50/min · norm 3.42
11353.68/min · norm 3.06
Sig. strikes absorbed
1892.94/min · norm 3.37
48.1%norm 44.9%
Striking accuracy
39.8%norm 43.5%
52.5%norm 55.25%
Striking defense
52.2%norm 56.3%
40.19/15 · norm 0.38
Knockdowns
10.23/15 · norm 0.25

Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)

Gilbert Burns

Distance 84.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 7.1% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 8.5% (norm 8.1%)

Jason Saggo

Distance 77.3% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 3.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 19.8% (norm 8.0%)

What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)

Gilbert Burns

Head 74.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 13.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.9% (norm 8.4%)

Jason Saggo

Head 71.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 16.3% (norm 7.9%)

Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone

Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.

Zone Burns L/AAccWelterweight med Saggo L/AAccLightweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 737 / 1708 43.1% 38.6% 102 / 313 32.6% 37.9%
In the clinch 99 / 144 68.8% 67.8% 6 / 12 too few to rate 67.3%
On the ground 138 / 173 79.8% 67.2% 53 / 80 66.2% 69.1%
BY TARGET
To the head 571 / 1506 37.9% 37.2% 90 / 289 31.1% 35.0%
To the body 216 / 279 77.4% 70.7% 25 / 50 50.0% 69.1%
To the legs 187 / 240 77.9% 82.9% 46 / 66 69.7% 81.9%

Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).

What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man

Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.

Zone vs Burns L/AOpp accWelterweight med vs Saggo L/AOpp accLightweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 957 / 2144 44.6% 39.0% 116 / 281 41.3% 38.9%
In the clinch 89 / 121 73.6% 68.9% 24 / 37 64.9% 68.6%
On the ground 89 / 126 70.6% 68.0% 49 / 77 63.6% 68.0%
BY TARGET
To the head 766 / 1896 40.4% 35.6% 137 / 324 42.3% 35.1%
To the body 196 / 298 65.8% 69.6% 28 / 37 75.7% 68.1%
To the legs 173 / 197 87.8% 82.1% 24 / 34 70.6% 81.5%

Grappling

Takedowns, control, submissions vs. division norm
4235.6% acc · 2.04/15 · norm 1.27
Takedowns landed
1040.0% acc · 2.33/15 · norm 1.38
2253.7% def · norm 63.9%
Takedowns stopped
323.1% def · norm 64.0%
70:2122.8% of cage time · norm 18.5%
Control time
17:4127.5% of cage time · norm 19.5%
36:521:47 per 15 · norm 3:15
Time under control
13:283:08 per 15 · norm 2:46
90.44/15 · norm 0.45
Submission attempts
00.00/15 · norm 0.49

Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Burns has more cage time on record.