Germaine de Randamie vs. Aspen Ladd
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Germaine de Randamie
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.04 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Aspen Ladd
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.23 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Germaine de Randamie
Distance 75.9% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 20.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 3.2% (norm 7.5%)
Aspen Ladd
Distance 64.8% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 11.8% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 23.3% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Germaine de Randamie
Head 69.4% (norm 75.2%) · Body 19.5% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 11.1% (norm 8.8%)
Aspen Ladd
Head 85.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.5% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 2.8% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Randamie L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Ladd L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 188 / 501 | 37.5% | 38.3% | 136 / 400 | 34.0% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 118 / 138 | 85.5% | 73.3% | 52 / 73 | 71.2% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 11 / 21 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 102 / 144 | 70.8% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 150 / 458 | 32.8% | 37.7% | 224 / 529 | 42.3% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 108 / 129 | 83.7% | 70.0% | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 59 / 73 | 80.8% | 80.9% | 15 / 17 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Randamie L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Ladd L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 141 / 513 | 27.5% | 41.3% | 235 / 524 | 44.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 48 / 60 | 80.0% | 74.7% | 117 / 143 | 81.8% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 85 / 204 | 41.7% | 74.2% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 136 / 578 | 23.5% | 38.1% | 187 / 482 | 38.8% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 62 / 97 | 63.9% | 73.2% | 138 / 155 | 89.0% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 76 / 102 | 74.5% | 80.9% | 32 / 37 | 86.5% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Randamie has more cage time on record.