David Onama vs. Nate Landwehr
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
David Onama
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.44 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
Nate Landwehr
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.74 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
David Onama
Distance 84.0% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 5.2% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 10.8% (norm 6.5%)
Nate Landwehr
Distance 84.5% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 12.3% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 3.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
David Onama
Head 85.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 9.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 5.2% (norm 7.8%)
Nate Landwehr
Head 81.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 11.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 7.8% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Onama L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Landwehr L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 403 / 854 | 47.2% | 40.9% | 435 / 1054 | 41.3% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 38 / 53 | 71.7% | 70.8% | 111 / 153 | 72.5% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 68 / 110 | 61.8% | 69.2% | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 406 / 870 | 46.7% | 37.2% | 418 / 1013 | 41.3% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 59 / 94 | 62.8% | 68.2% | 80 / 138 | 58.0% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 44 / 53 | 83.0% | 80.7% | 73 / 97 | 75.3% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Onama L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Landwehr L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 400 / 881 | 45.4% | 39.2% | 531 / 1130 | 47.0% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 48 / 77 | 62.3% | 70.3% | 41 / 63 | 65.1% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 43 / 62 | 69.4% | 69.4% | 41 / 63 | 65.1% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 312 / 783 | 39.8% | 35.9% | 434 / 1019 | 42.6% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 100 / 138 | 72.5% | 67.9% | 124 / 172 | 72.1% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 79 / 99 | 79.8% | 81.5% | 55 / 65 | 84.6% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Landwehr has more cage time on record.