Daniel Lacerda vs. Edgar Chairez

UFC 0-5-0 (1 NC) vs. 4-2-0 (1 NC)

Tale of the tape

Green = edge on that line
0-5-0 (1 NC)
UFC record
4-2-0 (1 NC)
Flyweight
Division (benchmark)
Flyweight
30
AgeΔ 0 yrs
30
5'6"
HeightΔ 1"
5'7"
70"
ReachΔ 1"
71"
Switch
Stance
Orthodox
29.4
Layoff (months)Δ 27.3 mo
2.1
LNCLLL
Last 5 (newest first)
WWWLW

The read

Stats 25%+ off the division median
Daniel Lacerda carries real power — 1.74 knockdowns per 15 minutes, vs a 0.18 Flyweight norm.
Edgar Chairez carries real power — 0.78 knockdowns per 15 minutes, vs a 0.18 Flyweight norm.
Edgar Chairez is a submission threat — 1.82 attempts per 15 minutes, vs a 0.58 Flyweight norm.

Level of competition

Full-career record by tier of opposition

Daniel Lacerda

Full career not yet synced for Daniel Lacerda — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).

In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500

Edgar Chairez

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 53
Tier 3 — regional circuit 93

Tier-weighted record quality: 0.91 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 21 documented bouts

In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500

Striking

Career totals · norms = own-division medians

Significant strikes — landed & absorbed

1023.95/min · norm 3.49
Sig. strikes landed
2233.86/min · norm 3.49
2148.28/min · norm 3.24
Sig. strikes absorbed
2644.57/min · norm 3.24
45.5%norm 44.6%
Striking accuracy
47.5%norm 44.6%
35.0%norm 56.4%
Striking defense
45.3%norm 56.4%
31.74/15 · norm 0.18
Knockdowns
30.78/15 · norm 0.18

Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)

Daniel Lacerda

Distance 82.6% (norm 85.1%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 11.2% (norm 7.3%)

Edgar Chairez

Distance 97.0% (norm 85.1%) · Clinch 0.9% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 2.1% (norm 7.3%)

What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)

Daniel Lacerda

Head 71.9% (norm 75.9%) · Body 17.9% (norm 13.3%) · Legs 10.3% (norm 9.3%)

Edgar Chairez

Head 74.0% (norm 75.9%) · Body 12.6% (norm 13.3%) · Legs 13.4% (norm 9.3%)

Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone

Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.

Zone Lacerda L/AAccFlyweight med Chairez L/AAccFlyweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 81 / 185 43.8% 40.0% 213 / 455 46.8% 40.0%
In the clinch 6 / 14 too few to rate 70.4% 4 / 4 too few to rate 70.4%
On the ground 15 / 25 60.0% 69.7% 6 / 10 too few to rate 69.7%
BY TARGET
To the head 57 / 161 35.4% 37.6% 133 / 347 38.3% 37.6%
To the body 25 / 40 62.5% 68.5% 41 / 59 69.5% 68.5%
To the legs 20 / 23 too few to rate 80.0% 49 / 63 77.8% 80.0%

Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Flyweight: 73 fighters · Flyweight: 73 fighters).

What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man

Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.

Zone vs Lacerda L/AOpp accFlyweight med vs Chairez L/AOpp accFlyweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 83 / 145 57.2% 40.1% 215 / 418 51.4% 40.1%
In the clinch 2 / 4 too few to rate 68.8% 6 / 7 too few to rate 68.8%
On the ground 129 / 180 71.7% 71.1% 43 / 58 74.1% 71.1%
BY TARGET
To the head 147 / 241 61.0% 35.2% 178 / 365 48.8% 35.2%
To the body 36 / 53 67.9% 68.2% 37 / 61 60.7% 68.2%
To the legs 31 / 35 88.6% 80.3% 49 / 57 86.0% 80.3%

Grappling

Takedowns, control, submissions vs. division norm
450.0% acc · 2.32/15 · norm 1.30
Takedowns landed
00.0% acc · 0.00/15 · norm 1.30
0— def · norm 62.5%
Takedowns stopped
746.7% def · norm 62.5%
4:0615.9% of cage time · norm 17.0%
Control time
1:463.1% of cage time · norm 17.0%
8:294:55 per 15 · norm 2:44
Time under control
20:095:13 per 15 · norm 2:44
21.16/15 · norm 0.58
Submission attempts
71.82/15 · norm 0.58

Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Chairez has more cage time on record.