Chris Beal vs. Joe Soto

UFC 2-3-0 vs. 3-5-0

Tale of the tape

Green = edge on that line
2-3-0
UFC record
3-5-0
Bantamweight
Division (benchmark)
Bantamweight
41
AgeΔ 2 yrs
39
5'7"
HeightΔ 1"
5'6"
69"
ReachΔ 4"
65"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
121.7
Layoff (months)Δ 19.6 mo
102.1
LLLWW
Last 5 (newest first)
LLWWW

The read

Stats 25%+ off the division median
Joe Soto is a submission threat — 1.91 attempts per 15 minutes, vs a 0.28 Bantamweight norm.
Joe Soto absorbs 5.37 sig. strikes per minute, well above the 3.58 Bantamweight norm — hittable.
Chris Beal hunts takedowns — 1.60 per 15 minutes, vs a 1.12 Bantamweight norm.

Level of competition

Full-career record by tier of opposition

Chris Beal

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 23
Tier 3 — regional circuit 94

Tier-weighted record quality: 0.26 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 18 documented bouts

In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.6 wins over .500

Joe Soto

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 76
Tier 3 — regional circuit 111

Tier-weighted record quality: 1.01 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 25 documented bouts

In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.1 wins over .500

Striking

Career totals · norms = own-division medians

Significant strikes — landed & absorbed

2263.45/min · norm 3.52
Sig. strikes landed
2383.36/min · norm 3.52
2083.18/min · norm 3.58
Sig. strikes absorbed
3805.37/min · norm 3.58
35.9%norm 43.4%
Striking accuracy
41.8%norm 43.4%
61.7%norm 56.6%
Striking defense
67.1%norm 56.6%
10.23/15 · norm 0.30
Knockdowns
00.00/15 · norm 0.30

Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)

Chris Beal

Distance 78.7% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 8.3% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 13.0% (norm 6.5%)

Joe Soto

Distance 94.0% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 1.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 4.4% (norm 6.5%)

What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)

Chris Beal

Head 92.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 6.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.0% (norm 8.4%)

Joe Soto

Head 88.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 4.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 7.4% (norm 8.4%)

Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone

Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.

Zone Beal L/AAccBantamweight med Soto L/AAccBantamweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 146 / 495 29.5% 39.0% 211 / 536 39.4% 39.0%
In the clinch 30 / 52 57.7% 68.7% 3 / 9 too few to rate 68.7%
On the ground 50 / 82 61.0% 70.2% 24 / 25 96.0% 70.2%
BY TARGET
To the head 192 / 582 33.0% 34.9% 195 / 505 38.6% 34.9%
To the body 28 / 41 68.3% 66.8% 17 / 23 too few to rate 66.8%
To the legs 6 / 6 too few to rate 79.4% 26 / 42 61.9% 79.4%

Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).

What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man

Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.

Zone vs Beal L/AOpp accBantamweight med vs Soto L/AOpp accBantamweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 163 / 479 34.0% 39.3% 338 / 1082 31.2% 39.3%
In the clinch 17 / 29 58.6% 70.4% 20 / 38 52.6% 70.4%
On the ground 28 / 35 80.0% 72.4% 22 / 34 64.7% 72.4%
BY TARGET
To the head 145 / 436 33.3% 34.9% 294 / 1037 28.4% 34.9%
To the body 24 / 41 58.5% 66.0% 56 / 80 70.0% 66.0%
To the legs 39 / 66 59.1% 79.1% 30 / 37 81.1% 79.1%

Grappling

Takedowns, control, submissions vs. division norm
758.3% acc · 1.60/15 · norm 1.12
Takedowns landed
421.1% acc · 0.85/15 · norm 1.12
1878.3% def · norm 66.7%
Takedowns stopped
1470.0% def · norm 66.7%
16:1124.7% of cage time · norm 17.4%
Control time
7:3110.6% of cage time · norm 17.4%
8:001:49 per 15 · norm 2:24
Time under control
8:191:45 per 15 · norm 2:24
10.23/15 · norm 0.28
Submission attempts
91.91/15 · norm 0.28

Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Soto has more cage time on record.