Cat Zingano vs. Julianna Pena
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Cat Zingano
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.16 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 19 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
Julianna Pena
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.0 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cat Zingano
Distance 46.8% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 18.0% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 35.3% (norm 7.5%)
Julianna Pena
Distance 74.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 7.6% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 18.2% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cat Zingano
Head 67.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 20.3% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 11.9% (norm 8.8%)
Julianna Pena
Head 87.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 10.6% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 1.7% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Zingano L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Pena L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 66 / 138 | 47.8% | 38.3% | 305 / 823 | 37.1% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 44 / 53 | 83.0% | 73.3% | 65 / 84 | 77.4% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 71 / 104 | 68.3% | 70.8% | 123 / 202 | 60.9% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 107 / 200 | 53.5% | 37.7% | 387 / 973 | 39.8% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 46 / 60 | 76.7% | 70.0% | 92 / 117 | 78.6% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 28 / 35 | 80.0% | 80.9% | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Zingano L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Pena L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 46 / 124 | 37.1% | 41.3% | 297 / 799 | 37.2% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 29 | 69.0% | 74.7% | 46 / 66 | 69.7% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 49 / 66 | 74.2% | 74.2% | 64 / 85 | 75.3% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 92 / 193 | 47.7% | 38.1% | 262 / 773 | 33.9% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 17 / 20 | too few to rate | 73.2% | 93 / 113 | 82.3% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 52 / 64 | 81.2% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Pena has more cage time on record.