Brian Ebersole vs. Dennis Hallman
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Brian Ebersole
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 46 | 14 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.62 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 34 finish wins over 71 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Dennis Hallman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 39 | 15 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.72 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 42 finish wins over 73 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Brian Ebersole
Distance 71.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 13.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 15.4% (norm 8.1%)
Dennis Hallman
Distance 43.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 38.3% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Brian Ebersole
Head 67.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 17.7% (norm 8.4%)
Dennis Hallman
Head 79.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.1% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ebersole L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Hallman L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 142 / 352 | 40.3% | 38.6% | 23 / 91 | 25.3% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 42 / 64 | 65.6% | 67.8% | 20 / 38 | 52.6% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 57 / 76 | 75.0% | 67.2% | 51 / 80 | 63.8% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 142 / 331 | 42.9% | 37.2% | 63 / 166 | 38.0% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 40 / 74 | 54.1% | 70.7% | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 59 / 87 | 67.8% | 82.9% | 12 / 17 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ebersole L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Hallman L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 156 / 421 | 37.1% | 39.0% | 51 / 127 | 40.2% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 70 / 112 | 62.5% | 68.9% | 33 / 44 | 75.0% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 80 / 120 | 66.7% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 122 / 386 | 31.6% | 35.6% | 113 / 227 | 49.8% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 77 / 110 | 70.0% | 69.6% | 37 / 43 | 86.0% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 36 / 47 | 76.6% | 82.1% | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hallman has more cage time on record.