Brian Camozzi vs. Geoff Neal
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Brian Camozzi
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.49 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 12 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Geoff Neal
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.07 · 12 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 24 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Brian Camozzi
Distance 98.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 1.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.4% (norm 8.1%)
Geoff Neal
Distance 86.9% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 8.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 5.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Brian Camozzi
Head 83.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 6.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 9.8% (norm 8.4%)
Geoff Neal
Head 90.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 6.1% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 3.5% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Camozzi L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Neal L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 64 / 241 | 26.6% | 38.6% | 566 / 1177 | 48.1% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 4 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 72 / 108 | 66.7% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 49 / 69 | 71.0% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 35 / 206 | 17.0% | 37.2% | 585 / 1225 | 47.8% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 11 / 16 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 58 / 82 | 70.7% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 19 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 44 / 47 | 93.6% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Camozzi L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Neal L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 95 / 246 | 38.6% | 39.0% | 684 / 1658 | 41.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 17 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 73 / 104 | 70.2% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 21 / 29 | 72.4% | 68.0% | 7 / 13 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 72 / 223 | 32.3% | 35.6% | 477 / 1409 | 33.9% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 40 / 49 | 81.6% | 69.6% | 208 / 280 | 74.3% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 20 / 20 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 79 / 86 | 91.9% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Neal has more cage time on record.