Amanda Ribas vs. Emily Whitmire
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Amanda Ribas
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.84 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.6 wins over .500
Emily Whitmire
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.0 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 1 finish wins over 9 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Amanda Ribas
Distance 91.6% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 3.1% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 5.3% (norm 5.0%)
Emily Whitmire
Distance 89.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 3.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 7.5% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Amanda Ribas
Head 76.6% (norm 76.4%) · Body 12.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 10.4% (norm 9.1%)
Emily Whitmire
Head 85.7% (norm 76.4%) · Body 7.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 6.3% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ribas L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Whitmire L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 589 / 1573 | 37.4% | 38.3% | 60 / 225 | 26.7% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 36 / 53 | 67.9% | 72.6% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 61 / 91 | 67.0% | 75.0% | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 421 / 1316 | 32.0% | 35.4% | 50 / 216 | 23.1% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 123 / 222 | 55.4% | 69.3% | 13 / 20 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 142 / 179 | 79.3% | 77.9% | 16 / 16 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ribas L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Whitmire L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 413 / 1180 | 35.0% | 39.7% | 76 / 175 | 43.4% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 43 / 60 | 71.7% | 71.5% | 6 / 11 | too few to rate | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 74 / 90 | 82.2% | 74.4% | 12 / 20 | too few to rate | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 369 / 1074 | 34.4% | 36.0% | 51 / 151 | 33.8% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 108 / 191 | 56.5% | 68.4% | 19 / 29 | 65.5% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 53 / 65 | 81.5% | 79.1% | 24 / 26 | 92.3% | 79.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ribas has more cage time on record.