Amanda Nunes vs. Sheila Gaff
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Amanda Nunes
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 16 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.59 · 16 tier-1/2 wins · 17 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 13-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.2 wins over .500
Sheila Gaff
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.32 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Amanda Nunes
Distance 73.4% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 2.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 23.8% (norm 7.5%)
Sheila Gaff
Distance 45.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 55.0% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Amanda Nunes
Head 74.9% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.1% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 14.0% (norm 8.8%)
Sheila Gaff
Head 40.0% (norm 75.2%) · Body 55.0% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 5.0% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Nunes L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Gaff L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 639 / 1309 | 48.8% | 38.3% | 2 / 9 | too few to rate | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 51 | 64.7% | 73.3% | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 256 / 424 | 60.4% | 70.8% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 629 / 1337 | 47.0% | 37.7% | 2 / 8 | too few to rate | 37.7% |
| To the body | 124 / 198 | 62.6% | 70.0% | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 175 / 249 | 70.3% | 80.9% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Nunes L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Gaff L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 397 / 1071 | 37.1% | 41.3% | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 45 / 66 | 68.2% | 74.7% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 57 / 89 | 64.0% | 74.2% | 16 / 20 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 338 / 1001 | 33.8% | 38.1% | 16 / 22 | too few to rate | 38.1% |
| To the body | 73 / 109 | 67.0% | 73.2% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 88 / 116 | 75.9% | 80.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Nunes has more cage time on record.